Sen. Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, has introduced legislation that would offer new Michigan public school employees a defined-contribution retirement plan instead of the state’s current pension plan. This would begin to contain the underfunding problems of government pension problems and save taxpayers billions over time while ensuring that the state meets its promises to retirees. Plus, it would help bring government employees’ benefits in balance with the private-sector.

The benefits provided by the public school retirement system are expensive, costing each district 23 to 24 percent of an employee’s salary. It also requires most workers to pay up to 6.4 percent of their paychecks into the system. In contrast, the private-sector plans offered by major Michigan private-sector companies cost 5 percent to 7 percent of payroll and have no mandatory employee contributions. The proposed legislation would include a maximum cost to taxpayers of 7 percent for pension benefits, right at those rates, and paticipants should also applaud the lack of mandatory contributions.

The state already closed its state employee pension plan to new members in 1997. Earlier this year, we estimated that it saved taxpayers $167 million in annual pension costs and an additional $2.3 billion to $4.3 billion in unfunded liabilities.

Currently, the public school retirement system is behind on its pension obligations by $17.63 billion. This is the difference between what the state has set aside to pay in pensions and what it expects its employees and retirees to have earned. So these costs are going to be paid by taxpayers one way or another. Changing over to a defined-contribution plan keeps the state from racking up much more. It also ensures that the catch up costs — about half the employer contributions — will eventually go away.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Closing the pension system is needed to make the it affordable, predictable and current, as Richard C. Dreyfuss, an adjunct scholar with the Mackinac Center, remarked. In the end, that will benefit workers who will be paid what they are promised and for taxpayers who would no longer be on the hook for expensive pension underfunding.


See also:

Michigan $1 Billion Closer to Bringing Benefits In Balance

Legal Options for Public Employee Compensation Reform

Commentary: Bringing Local Government Benefits in Balance

Video: Benefits in Balance

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Renting out the family summer cottage is a common practice in Michigan, and with today’s technologies, it’s easier than ever, empowered by services like AirBnB, HomeAway, VRBO and more. These short-term rentals mean vacationers can find a place much more easily and inexpensively, while owners can earn some extra money. It seems like a win-win. Not everyone agrees. Some in the accommodations and tourism industries aren’t happy with the increased competition and are advocating for limiting people’s rights to rent out their homes. Some homeowner associations are pushing back as well. And while cities like Detroit and Grand Rapids have mostly embraced home sharing, some local governments have restricted and even banned the practice.

Related Sites