At a campaign stop on Saturday, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said that if he is elected he will stop federal funding for passenger rail, including Amtrak.

“I like those things, I just think they have to be paid for by private funds, not by funds from China,” he said.

The Michigan news website Mlive.con highlighted the story and quoted a response from Amtrak President and CEO Joe Boardman about similar statements in the past that would cut funding to the service:

“Congress has given Amtrak a critical national mission to provide intercity passenger rail service, and with an appropriate level of federal funding support, we can secure a stronger future for our country and reduce the nation’s dependence on foreign oil,” Boardman said earlier this month.

The beneficiaries of a government subsidy — including the bureaucrats who administer it — always claim the taxpayer dollars are “critical” to some “mission” of helping some undetermined amount of people in some immeasurable way; Amtrak is a case study of such claims.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The federally funded rail service began in 1970 in response to the financial failure of private passenger rail providers. It promised that the service would be profitable within three years. More than 40 years and tens of billions of dollars later, Amtrak is still bleeding red ink. Subsidies total nearly half a billion dollars this year and the “service” has never turned a profit.

With few exceptions, rail projects, from Amtrak to high-speed rail to the People Mover, are models of inefficiency. The subsidies per passenger and per mile are off the charts when compared to other forms of transportation. And it is only through government accounting that taxpayers would spend $1 million in renovations on a train service with only 78 daily passengers, as taxpayers will for the Amtrak station in Jackson.

Political promises are often forgotten a short time after they are made. When they are recalled, bureaucrats simply promise that this time things will be different. Amtrak is no exception and Congress should end this expensive mistake.


Related Articles:

Targeted Business Subsidies vs. Broad Tax Relief

In the Battle for Jobs, Subsidy Programs Shoot Blanks

Taxpayers Deserve to Know Details of Business Subsidy Deals

Jobs Department’s Fake News: $10 Tax return for Every $1 in Subsidies

Some Budget Ideas for 2017

Subsidies Bad For Taxpayers

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites