State Spending Up and Up, But Spending Interests Cry Poverty

Spending has increased $6.4 billion over five years

Total spending by the state of Michigan has increased for five consecutive years.

The first state budget Gov. Rick Snyder signed, for 2011-12, authorized spending $47.6 billion from state, federal and local sources. Spending increased in each of the next five fiscal years. For the 2016-17 state budget that began Oct. 1, the Michigan Legislature authorized $54.0 billion in government spending.

The current state budget spends more from all sources than ever. State spending from state sources was $25.2 billion in 2009-10 and $31.0 billion in the current 2016-17 budget.

Yet tax and spending advocates said there is a need for more.

“Michigan clearly has a revenue problem, and it needs to be addressed in a broader sense,” said Gilda Jacobs, the executive director of the Michigan League for Public Policy, in June about the 2017 state budget.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The second largest source of money spent by the state is the federal government, and its share has fluctuated this decade, largely due to the federal stimulus spending. For example, $21.1 billion in federal dollars passed through Michigan’s state government in 2008-09, with $5.0 billion of that due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Federal contributions to state spending didn’t see $21.1 billion again until the 2014-15 fiscal year, when state lawmakers were able to spend $22.8 billion sent from Washington, D.C. In the current year, the state will receive and spend $22.7 billion in federal money.

“The state budget has continued to increase since the end of the recession,” said James Hohman, the assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. “This has provided state lawmakers with more tax dollars to spend.”


Your gift to Capitol Confidential supports investigative reporting in the public interest that includes a free-market point of view. Please consider a donation today to keep citizens informed about the challenges facing our state and nation.

Related Articles:

No Names in State Budget, But 36 Recipients Getting $38 Million

Millions For Local Earmarks, But Not A Cent To Right An Injustice?

Millions Borrowed And Spent For Enviro Cleanups – But Did They Happen?

State Spends $660 Million In Public Debt, But For What?

Despite Record State Revenue, Spending Interests Predict Budget Meltdown

Governor’s Budget Pays for Medicaid Expansion with a Gas Tax

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites