How Lansing Dodges Tax Cuts

Never admit state government is taking more

In a March 29 newspaper story about Gov. Rick Snyder’s proposed budget, Democratic politicians warned about “de-investment” in the state.

“In my opinion, Michigan has been a state where we’ve de-invested in so many things, that I’m not looking for de-investment now,” said Sen. Curtis Hertel Jr., D-Meridian Township, in a report out of The Detroit News. “If we want to give tax relief to the middle class, we can do it by actually making sure that corporations pay some part of their fair share.”

State Rep. Yousef Rabhi, D-Ann Arbor, echoed Hertel’s comments about more investment needed in the state.

ForTheRecord says: Most of the political establishment in Lansing appears determined never to acknowledge that the amount of taxpayer money flowing into the Michigan Department of Treasury has risen every year since 2010-11. They instead try to create a perception of continual belt-tightening.

This bipartisan party line makes it harder to pass even a modest tax cut, as the Speaker of the House and most of the Republican caucus discovered in a failed Feb. 23 roll call vote on a 0.2 percent income tax cut.

State spending from state taxes and fees — not including federal money — has risen for seven consecutive years and is projected to rise again for an eighth time in the 2016-17 fiscal year.

The state spent $25.2 billion in 2009-10 and its spending in the current fiscal year will reach $31.1 billion. Snyder’s budget proposes to make state spending climb to $31.9 billion next year. These figures do not include federal dollars in the budget.

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites