For Immediate Release
Friday, Jan. 28, 2011
Contact: Michael D. LaFaive
Director of Fiscal Policy
Michael D. Jahr
Senior Director of Communications

MIDLAND — Today’s announcement that Gov. Rick Snyder’s flat corporate income tax proposal would eliminate Michigan Economic Growth Authority tax credits, including the film subsidy, represents a victory for taxpayers and good government, said Mackinac Center Director of Fiscal Policy Michael LaFaive.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

“This is a bold move to fix Michigan with a simpler business tax system and one that would eliminate ‘jobs’ programs that don’t create any,” said LaFaive.

The Mackinac Center has been the longest and most consistent critic of MEGA and other economic development programs. In 1995, Center analysts published a study that warned against undertaking the MEGA program. A 2005 Mackinac Center study found that for every $123,000 in MEGA tax credits offered, the program created just one construction job, but 100 percent of those disappeared within two years. The Center’s 2009 MEGA study found an association between manufacturing jobs and the program, but it was negative. That is, for every $1 million in tax credits actually earned by MEGA companies in a given county, there was an associated loss of 95 manufacturing jobs in that county.

“At best, MEGA is a job announcement program, not a job creation program,” LaFaive added.

Mackinac Center President Joseph G. Lehman said the decision was a positive development for Michigan’s struggling economy. “MEGA has been one of Michigan’s brightest industrial policy failures, distracting lawmakers from effective tax reform while dozens of states left us in the dust,” Lehman said. “More moves like this will stop Michigan’s slide and begin her resurgence.

“Who knows how many of our 858,000 lost jobs could have been saved if Gov. Snyder’s predecessors had done what he is doing now?” Lehman added.


Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites