Michigan's Job Loss Apocalypse Averted!

No thanks to the 'Department of Corporate Welfare.'

During a three-month period ending last September, 190,661 Michigan jobs disappeared. That’s nearly one out of every 20 jobs in the state.

So why weren’t there headlines about an employment apocalypse? Because during the same period 227,785 new jobs were created here. This “job churn” is typical of the dynamic U.S. economy and labor market, and it goes on continuously.

Michigan’s “one-state recession” of the past decade occurred not because no new jobs were created, but because more jobs disappeared:

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Michigan's Job Gains and Losses

Among other lessons, job-churn figures expose the absurdity of state corporate welfare schemes granting tax breaks and subsidies to a handful of politically-favored firms or industries.

During that same three-month period last summer, officials at the Michigan Economic Development Corporation granted special subsidy deals to firms promising 3,696 jobs, on the theory that giving discriminatory favors for a handful of companies is the way to grow Michigan’s economy. Past experience shows that only one-third of those promised jobs will ever actually happen, or around 1,087.

227,785 vs. 1,087.  Seems like a waste of time and money to hand out those special favors. Not to mention the potential for corruption and actual erosion of the rule of law this activity represents.

These numbers reveal that to get the kind of job creation numbers needed to compensate for the jobs that disappear, it’s necessary to make the state’s overall tax, regulatory and labor law regimes more attractive to all employers, not just a select few.

Government corporate welfare schemes are not an “economic development” program that benefits the people of a state, but rather a political development one that benefits politicians and a handful of special interests. When a politician boasts of some firm opening a plant due to discriminatory “incentives” he approved, the sound he hears should hear is boos, not cheers.

Related Articles:

What Happens When the Michigan Economic Development Corporation Ends?

84 Companies Offered $63.8 Million Michigan Taxpayer Dollars In 2016

Let's Make a (Special) Deal: Legislators Can't Shake the Habit

Political Reasons, Not Economic Ones, Keep Corporate Welfare Agency Alive

In 20 Years, Only Two Corporate Welfare Recipients Created 1,000+ Jobs

Need A Microscope to Find the Corporate Welfare Jobs in Michigan's Economy

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites