Commentary: Pension Liabilities Larger Than Reported

Report shows that taxpayers could be on the hook for even larger pension costs than previously thought

Comment Print Mail Share Facebook Twitter

As Michigan legislators consider whether to close the defined-benefit school pension system to newly hired employees, instead giving them generous 401(k) contributions, a report from State Budget Solutions shows that the unfunded liabilities of defined-benefit systems may be even larger than previously reported, not just in Michigan, but all around the country.

Using data from 2008, when unfunded liabilities were much lower than current amounts, the report compares the gaps between assets and liabilities in state financial statements to some alternative ways of calculating taxpayer obligations. In its financial statements, the state uses an optimistic investment assumption. Lowering it vastly increases estimates of the state’s liabilities. In addition, applying a different kind of analysis based on option pricing also shows that taxpayers may be providing more generous benefits than expected.

Specifically, the older estimate for all Michigan state government pension systems — not just the one for school employees — showed unfunded liabilities of $11.5 billion using the optimistic “official” investment return assumptions. However, when the alternative methods were applied to the systems, the unfunded liabilities skyrocketed to $63.6 billion and $72.2 billion.

In other words, in automobile terms, the current defined-benefit pension system is a lemon — its actual lifetime costs are likely to be more than advertised.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The underfunding problem has only increased since 2008. The unfunded liabilities in just the school pension system are now projected at $22.4 billion, using the same optimistic assumptions as that “official” 2008 estimate. The other methods suggest that the problem can be much worse than even the state acknowledges.

To contain the underfunding problem, the state should place new employees into a system that no longer puts taxpayers on the hook for benefits payable many decades into the future. That is, the state should close these defined-benefit systems to new employees.

In contrast, giving employees defined-contribution 401(k)-type benefits creates no new long-term taxpayer liabilities or uncertainties. The Michigan Senate has already passed a bill that does this. The state House, however, has passed a bill that keeps racking up promises of an uncertain cost. Voters and taxpayers can decide for themselves which is the better approach.


See also:

Commentary: House GOP Would Stick Taxpayers With Billions for Optional School Retiree Benefits

Commentary: Legislators Choose School Employees Over Taxpayers on Retirement Benefit Reform

Commentary: Low-Balled School Pension Contributions Kick Taxpayers in the Teeth


Related Articles:

Obama’s Overtime Rule Would Hurt Those It’s Intended To Help

Detroit Metro’s Economy No. 14 In U.S., Bigger Than Nation Of Chile

Michigan House Passes Bills Rolling Back Arbitrary ‘Handyman’ Licensing

Legacy Society

Proposed Beer Tax Hike Would Hurt Brewers

September 23, 2016 MichiganVotes Weekly Roll Call Report

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Emmet County Commissioners are spending millions of dollars on lavish ambulance stations and an observatory to gaze at stars. The projects are being funded by a bond issue that bypassed voters.

Related Sites