Media Promotes Massively Inflated 'Green Jobs' Number Put Out by Ballot Proposal Supporters

Reports exaggerate projected jobs by up to 30 times above what MSU study said

When is a job not a job? When it’s a job year.

Although it sounds like a riddle told at an economic development convention, it has become a central point of an emerging debate about a ballot initiative that would increase the state’s renewable energy mandate from 10 percent to 25 percent.

At the heart of the controversy is how a study, which was done under a contract between Michigan State University and the Michigan Environmental Council, described how it calculated the amount of jobs the 25 percent mandate would create if passed.

The study said 74,495 “job years” would be created if the mandate was passed. The report states that a job year is full employment for one person for 2,080 hours in a 12-month period. It also states that "operations" and "maintenance" jobs were calculated for the life of a plant, which varied between 20 and 30 years.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

That means one job could translate to as many as 30 job years.

However, numerous news sources and advocates for the proposed ballot initiative have inaccurately described the MSU study as saying the ballot initiative would create 74,495 jobs, not job years. This inflates what the study actually said by predicting up to 30 times as many jobs.

Crain’s Detroit Business said in a story that the proposed ballot initiative would create 74,000 jobs. The Detroit News also reported the 74,000 jobs figure. 

The Michigan League of Conservation Voters' Political Director Ryan Werder also incorrectly wrote that the ballot initiative would create 74,000 jobs and not job years. 

Saul Anuzis, the former head of the state Republican Party, who supports the ballot initiative, also made reference to jobs and not job years in an email he widely distributed.

Greene and Werder didn’t respond to emails seeking comment.

Anuzis said he was not being paid to promote the ballot initiative. He referred comment about the jobs versus job years to a consulting firm in favor of the ballot initiative.

Douglas Jester, a principal at 5 Lakes Energy, a clean energy and environmental consulting firm in favor of the ballot initiative, said many economic impact studies in the past involved job years but were reported as jobs. He said that was a standard practice and didn't come under scrutiny until the MSU report described in detail the concept of job years.

"They (MSU authors) were being precise about it where other reports have glossed over it," Jester said.

But Michael LaFaive, a fiscal policy analyst at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, said the distinction is important.

"We should care because the job years claim may overstate the real impact of this mandate," LaFaive said. "A higher number may convince people that the benefits of the mandate greatly outweigh the costs, when they do not."


See also:

Environmental Group Exaggerates Number of Jobs 'Green' Energy Mandate Would Create

Former Gov. Predicted 17,000 Jobs From 'Green Energy' Mandate, Number of Jobs Has Actually Dropped

Gov't Report: Wind Energy Needs Taxpayer Support To Survive

Related Articles:

Local Ballot Initiatives Target Police, Prosecutors Confiscating Property

WikiLeaks: Granholm's Obama Job Application Oversold Clean Energy Jobs

May 20, 2016 MichiganVotes Weekly Roll Call Report

Michigan Is Not a Windy State

Raising the Age: Should 17-Year-Olds be Eligible for Juvenile Justice in Michigan?

New Video Series Looks Underneath the Hood at How School Funding Works

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


The Republican Party fully controls most states and at the national level has captured the House, Senate and presidency. By many measures, the party has more power than it has had in many decades. But will that control last? And, more importantly, what policy priorities are coming about from these political victories?

Related Sites