The New York Times reports that the failure of Proposal 2 is “an embarrassing loss for labor in a state known as a cradle of American unionism.”

F. Vincent Vernuccio, labor policy director, told The Times that “Voters were afraid of amending the constitution to give that much power to organized labor and make them a superlegislature above their representatives.”

The Times also pointed out that Proposal 2 received about 600,000 fewer votes than President Obama got in Michigan, “indicating that many Democrats turned against labor on this issue.”

Vernuccio noted that many Democrats and members of private-sector unions saw the amendment as “a power grab by government unions.”

The Daily Caller noted that the rejection of Proposal 2 “was a major defeat for teachers’ unions.” The MEA, AFT and local affiliates gave about $1 million to support the initiative.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

“It shows that the Democratic Party is not knee-jerk union anymore,” Vernuccio said. “It shows how much of an overreach it was that even Obama Democrats voted against [the proposal].”


Related Articles:

A Response to the New York Times About Charter Schools in Michigan

Vernuccio Quoted on UAW Bullying in The Detroit News

The New York Times’ Comprehension Problem on Detroit Charters

More Inaccuracies in New York Times Attack on Michigan Charter Schools

New York Times Cherry-Picks Data In Takedown Of Michigan Charter Schools

New York Times Article, Critical of Charter Schools, Misses Key Point on School Funding

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites