News reports about the pending right-to-work legislation are filled with dire predictions and statistics that fit specific story lines.

The Detroit Free Press, for example, ran a story after right-to-work legislation was introduced in the state House and Senate claiming that right-to-work states had lower-income residents than non-right-to-work states.

"The data on wages tell a fairly clear story," the Free Press story said. "Of the top 10 states in per capita income in 2011, seven were not right-to-work states. Of the bottom 10 states with the lowest per capita income, seven were right-to work states.”

However, Mackinac Center for Public Policy Fiscal Policy Analyst James Hohman said there are flaws in that logic.

The Free Press inaccurately used per capita income data to support a claim about wages, Hohman said.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Per capita personal income is different than wages. Per capita income includes such compensation as welfare payments and unemployment benefits and investment gains, all of which have little to do with the impact right-to-work has on wages, he said. Hohman estimated that per capita personal income is made up of about 65 to 70 percent of wages.

Also, the Free Press implied that where right-to-work states rank in terms of per capita income is due to right-to-work legislation.

That isn't necessarily true either, Hohman said.

Many right-to-work states lagged behind non-right-to-work states in per capita income before right-to-work even became an option in 1947.

For example, from 1929 to 1946, Texas’ per capita income was $540, which at that time put it 36 percent below the average per capita income of non-right-to-work states. In 2011, Texas’ per capita income was $40,147 and was just 8 percent below the average per capita income of non-right-to-work states.

“In other words, the gaps in incomes have existed before right-to-work laws and have only narrowed since,” Hohman said.

Related Articles:

Vernuccio Testifies on Right-to-Work in West Virginia

West Virginia House Vote Could Tip National Scale on Right-to-Work

Right-to-Work States Have Faster Income Growth

Mackinac Research Cited by Wall Street Journal

Americans are Moving to Right-to-Work States

Majority of States in Country Are Now Right-to-Work

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites