Films or Potholes?

Cost of film subsidy program would repair over 5 million potholes

The Republican-controlled Michigan Legislature has passed a budget allocating $50 million for the state's film subsidy program.

Previously, the budget from House Republicans proposed eliminating the program, while Gov. Rick Snyder, who has said he is philosophically opposed to the program, asked for $25 million. But the GOP and Democratic leadership in the Michigan Senate wanted a minimum of $50 million annually.

Meanwhile, Michiganders are being told by the governor, legislators and outside groups that the state needs to devote more money to fixing the roads. That is true, but before legislators impose a tax increase on residents they should end the film program and use the money for infrastructure.

After all, if road funding is so important that it would literally "save lives," as advocates of increased road spending say, how many lives are the Legislature and governor risking by spending millions on subsidies to Big Hollywood?

Here is what taxpayers could get for the $50 million lawmakers are pledging toward films for the upcoming fiscal year (all numbers are approximate):

For a lot of reasons, film subsidies are one of the least efficient ways to use public dollars. Since the program began in 2008, the state has spent $400 million — that's an awful lot of unfixed potholes.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

* There are few sources for the cost of repairing potholes. According to the Calhoun County Road Commission, it costs an average of $9.41 to fix a pothole.


Related Articles:

Potential Corporate Welfare Binge Risks Second Michigan ‘Lost Decade’

Done: With School Pension Reform, State's Big Pension Liabilities Contained

84 Companies Offered $63.8 Million Michigan Taxpayer Dollars In 2016

Why Pension Reform Is Hard for Politicians

The Legislative Clock is Ticking

Michigan Pothole Hotline Has More Business This Year

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

Renting out the family summer cottage is a common practice in Michigan, and with today’s technologies, it’s easier than ever, empowered by services like AirBnB, HomeAway, VRBO and more. These short-term rentals mean vacationers can find a place much more easily and inexpensively, while owners can earn some extra money. It seems like a win-win. Not everyone agrees. Some in the accommodations and tourism industries aren’t happy with the increased competition and are advocating for limiting people’s rights to rent out their homes. Some homeowner associations are pushing back as well. And while cities like Detroit and Grand Rapids have mostly embraced home sharing, some local governments have restricted and even banned the practice.

Related Sites