A Request For Lower Beer And Wine Prices

Mackinac Center asks for rule change that would lower prices for consumers

Comment Print Mail ShareFacebook Twitter More

Your beer and wine costs more than it should because Michigan has anti-competitive rules that benefit wholesalers instead of consumers.

That's because of "post and hold" rules that mandate that alcohol wholesalers and manufacturers post price changes for beer and wine and then leave them in place for a specific amount of time, said Michael LaFaive, director or the Morey Fiscal Policy Initiative at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

Locking in prices allows companies to coordinate pricing with their so-called competition, he said.

At the Michigan Liquor Control Commission's semi-annual public hearing on Thursday, the Mackinac Center submitted a formal request to the agency to rescind the state's post and hold rules.

Once prices are posted, they have to be held at that level for a specific amount of time. Prices on beer must be held steady for 180 days; three months for wine. Changes can only be made with permission from the Liquor Control Commission.

According to liquor law experts, post and hold laws were created to ensure that all businesses buy their alcohol at the same price. Quantity discounts are not allowed. Wholesalers have to sell their products to retailers at the same price. The idea is the smaller stores are protected from the bigger chains. But it leads to non-competitive pricing, according to a study done in 2014 at Columbia University.

Another study, done at George Mason University, found that post and hold laws can add up to $2.24 to the cost of a six pack of beer, and up to $1.10 for a bottle of wine.

"This is just one of many examples of Michigan’s archaic regulations that stifles competition, harms consumers and enriches wholesalers," LaFaive said in a press release. "It effectively imposes a form of government-facilitated price collusion."

~~~~~

See also:

Time To Kill Michigan Alcohol Monopoly

Liquored Up: Michigan Government Should Exit Its Liquor Wholesale Business

Liquor Distribution Monopolies Rob Consumers, Taxpayers and Job Providers

Time To Scotch Michigan's Wholesale Alcohol Monopolies

Analysis: State Alcohol Control Law Expensive, Unfair, Ineffective

Alcohol Regulation Study: No Advantage To Tighter Restrictions

Michigan's Government-Mandated Beer Contracts: Harder To Escape Than Marriage?

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

Most Popular

Police seize assets of Michigan residents who have not been charged with crimes. One man was told he could get his belongings back for a price. Another had his bank accounts frozen and was unable to pay bills. He also lost property he called "auctionable." Last year, law enforcement raised over $20,000,000 from seizing personal property.

Related Sites