Hunting Fees Going To Private Landowners

Grant program aims to improve deer habitat

A white-tail deer. (Photo from Wikimedia Commons)

A new grant program in Michigan takes extra money from hunting and fishing fees and distributes it to private landowners.

The state Department of Natural Resources recently announced 12 wildlife habitat grant winners for the "Deer PLAN" (Private Land Assistance Network). This grant is available to private landowners in six counties in northern Michigan ostensibly to improve deer habitat.

One hunter wasn't thrilled about the program. Tom Wills is an outdoorsman from Quinnesec in the Upper Peninsula.

"I can't tell you how happy I am to hear that Michigan DNR is giving my license fees to a dozen private land owners, including five private hunt clubs," he said sarcastically.

He is concerned about what he sees as Lansing's ever-increasing role in people's lives and doesn't see this as a proper role for government.

The DNR believes it is. They argue that the 24 percent of land that is publically owned does not have enough impact on deer in the state and grants need to go to private groups.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

According to Ashley Autenrieth, the deer program biologist, the money for the program comes from the Deer Range Improvement Program (DRIP) and the Fish and Games fund.

"The applicants themselves are also required to contribute 25 percent of the finances,” Autenrieth said.

The DNR chose the applicants based on the benefits to deer habitat, feasibility of the project, public accessibility, and cost sharing. The program spent $50,000.

When asked if these fees should benefit private landowners, Autenrieth said this helps all hunters and the state.

“Deer do not solely reside on public land and in fact the majority of deer are on private land," she said. "Therefore, working across public and private land boundaries would benefit the species and will invariably improve conditions for all hunters."

~~~~~

See also:

Taxing Canoes and Kayaks 


Related Articles:

Legislature Looking to Streamline Internet Services

More State Oversight Needed for Government Assistance Programs

Government Growth Proposed in Gov. Snyder's 2017 State of the State

Lansing’s Political Dictionary: $400 Million Tax Revenue Increase Called ‘Shortfall’

An Opening for Michigan Licensing Reform

Keeping Government Entities on Track

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites