Michigan Will Have No Ballot Questions This Year

Voters have decided on many in recent elections

There will be no statewide questions on Michigan’s ballot when voters head to the polls Nov. 8. An analysis of Michigan history found that 1960 — 56 years ago — was the last presidential election year in which there wasn’t also a public vote on an initiative or referendum.

The Bureau of Elections, part of the Michigan Secretary of State, confirmed to Michigan Capitol Confidential that no ballot measures made it to the fall ballot. Ten initiative petitions were filed with the Secretary of State, according to Ballotpedia

Three initiatives that didn’t make the ballot would have legalized recreational marijuana use. An initiative to ban hydraulic fracturing (often dubbed “fracking”) did not receive enough signatures to make the ballot. An initiative that would have raised corporate income taxes in the state statute also did not make the ballot. 

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Since 1996, 47 percent of ballot questions — 18 of 38 — have been approved by Michigan voters, while 53 percent — 20 of 38 — have been rejected, Ballotpedia notes.

Michigan citizens can place proposals on the ballot by collecting signatures to initiate a new state statute, adopt or revise constitutional amendments, or force a referendum on a newly enacted law.

Signature requirements for ballot proposals are set in the Michigan Constitution and based on the number of citizens who voted in the last gubernatorial election.

For referendums, opponents of a new law must gather signatures equal to 5 percent of the number of votes cast in the last election for governor. To initiate a new statute, supporters need signatures equal to 8 percent of that vote, and changing the constitution requires 10 percent.

Leon Drolet, chairman of Michigan Taxpayer Alliance and a former state representative from Macomb County, says conclusions can’t really be drawn from the lack of statewide ballot questions in 2016. 

“Getting an issue on the statewide is complicated and expensive,” he said. “It takes either substantial legislative consensus in Lansing or well organized and funded petition initiatives.” 

“Frankly, I'm surprised that this is the first year without a ballot question in such a long time. I would have guessed that there would be many years where the challenges to getting a question on the ballot haven't been met,” Drolet added.


Related Articles:

Let Them Take Selfies: Explaining Michigan’s Law

Post a Photo of Your Marked Ballot? You've Broken the Law

For This City’s Politicians, Keeping A Lid On Spending Called ‘Trying Times’

Ballot-Selfie Ban Stands In Way of Free Speech

Local Ballot Initiatives Target Police, Prosecutors Confiscating Property

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites