Michigan is Spending As Much on State Police Pensions as Salaries

Past underfunding means nearly $1 in retirement costs for every $1 in pay

The cost of providing retirement benefits for Michigan State Police employees nearly matched their gross pay last year, with most of the money going toward paying down debts incurred by decades of pension underfunding.

One out of every five dollars spent by the state police last year went for retirement benefits, according to the Senate Fiscal Agency. Total state police spending in the 2015-16 fiscal year was $640.1 million, with $115.7 million of this going toward the retirement system. That compares to $118.1 million paid in gross wages to employees.

More than 75 cents out of every dollar in retirement spending went toward paying down unfunded pension liabilities. Only 19 to 23 cents out of every dollar of the benefit expenses were for pension credits earned by current employees during the year.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

According to Senate Fiscal Agency figures, the state police retirement system is $1.2 billion short of the amount its managers project is needed to meet pensions and post-retirement health benefits.

James Hohman, assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, said that underfunding is causing the state police to vastly overpay for benefits.

“State troopers are offered generous retirement benefits and that’s fine,” Hohman said. “But the underfunding in the system means that they are getting Cadillac benefits at Ferrari prices.”

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Renting out the family summer cottage is a common practice in Michigan, and with today’s technologies, it’s easier than ever, empowered by services like AirBnB, HomeAway, VRBO and more. These short-term rentals mean vacationers can find a place much more easily and inexpensively, while owners can earn some extra money. It seems like a win-win. Not everyone agrees. Some in the accommodations and tourism industries aren’t happy with the increased competition and are advocating for limiting people’s rights to rent out their homes. Some homeowner associations are pushing back as well. And while cities like Detroit and Grand Rapids have mostly embraced home sharing, some local governments have restricted and even banned the practice.

Related Sites