Right-to-Work States See Larger Gains

Personal income and population growth numbers released

The 2013 state personal income data was released recently and it has some good news for Michigan.

The state had the 9th best performance among the states from 2012 to 2013. While it's unclear how much of a role the passage of the right-to-work law had in the performance, it is worth a look at the trends between states with a right-to-work law and those without one.

In both personal income and in population growth, right-to-work states clearly have an advantage. From 2012 to 2013, right-to-work states grew their personal incomes by 2.8 percent and their populations by 0.9 percent. Non-right-to-work states grew their personal incomes by 2.4 percent and their populations by 0.4 percent.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Personal Income Growth

Population Growth

When combined, per capita personal income between the two groups of states increased at roughly the same amounts. Michigan's above average per capita personal income growth can be attributed to average personal income growth and below average population growth.

Over the long term, right-to-work laws have been associated with inflation adjusted personal income growth, population increases and job growth.

Right-to-work may or may not be an influence, but Michigan's recent performance has shown improvements in all three measures.


Related Articles:

Right-to-Work States Have Faster Income Growth

Americans are Moving to Right-to-Work States

That’s What We Said

Incomes Rise in Right-to-Work Michigan; Officials Project More To Come

Mackinac Research Cited by Wall Street Journal

West Virginia House Vote Could Tip National Scale on Right-to-Work

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites