Police Set Up Crime, Entrap College Student’s Cellphone and $100

Though none were criminally charged, 523 in Michigan still lost property forfeited to police last year

In 2016, police officials from two Michigan cities teamed up to place an advertisement soliciting sex on a website commonly used for prostitution.

The Kalamazoo Valley Enforcement Team, which is a joint operation of police officers from the cities of Kalamazoo and Portage created to run drug investigations, then used an informant to agree to be a prostitute for the sting operation.

On March 31, 2016, a Western Michigan University student answered the fake advertisement. When he paid the informant $100, police were listening from an adjoining hotel room and through the door. The student was not arrested but admitted to paying for sex.

The WMU student was never charged with a committing a crime because this would have required the police to name the informant. Yet police seized his cellphone and $100 anyway and kept it through a process known as civil asset forfeiture.

In Michigan, one in 10 people whose property is taken and kept by police in forfeiture actions is never charged with a crime. A state report shows that more than $15.3 million in cash and property was forfeited last year.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

That WMU student was one of 523 people who had seized property forfeited without being charged with a crime. In this case, police created the circumstances for the crime to be committed and then did not charge the individual they lured. But they did keep his money and cell phone.

Michigan Capitol Confidential has sent Freedom of Information Act requests to dozens of local and state agencies asking for the reports involving cases in which property was seized and then forfeited to police. The information for this story came from the public records received from a FOIA request.

The Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety and City Manager Jim Ritsema didn’t respond to emails seeking comment.

 


Related Articles:

Michigan Should End Civil Asset Forfeiture

Michigan Forfeiture Laws Improving, But State Transparency Still Falls Behind

Key Part of Civil Asset Forfeiture Law Ruled Unconstitutional

Forfeiture From People Not Convicted of a Crime in Michigan Isn’t ‘Rare’

Michigan Must Stop Keeping Peoples’ Property Without Conviction

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

Renting out the family summer cottage is a common practice in Michigan, and with today’s technologies, it’s easier than ever, empowered by services like AirBnB, HomeAway, VRBO and more. These short-term rentals mean vacationers can find a place much more easily and inexpensively, while owners can earn some extra money. It seems like a win-win. Not everyone agrees. Some in the accommodations and tourism industries aren’t happy with the increased competition and are advocating for limiting people’s rights to rent out their homes. Some homeowner associations are pushing back as well. And while cities like Detroit and Grand Rapids have mostly embraced home sharing, some local governments have restricted and even banned the practice.

Related Sites