Politics Prevailed With Michigan's Minimum Wage Increase

Event today will discuss ways to mitigate the harm caused by the forced wage mandate

Republican control of Michigan’s government didn’t prevent a minimum wage increase and an increase in taxes may be coming to fix Michigan’s roads.

That’s left many wondering whether the GOP got outmaneuvered or was painted into a corner to prevent a minimum wage ballot initiative that would have been worse.

It was both, combined with plenty of politics, wrote Joseph Lehman, president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, and Michael LaFaive, director of fiscal policy at the Center, in a recent Wall Street Journal column:

Careful economic analysis did not lead the Michigan GOP to hike the minimum wage. Instead they implemented a two-pronged political strategy that local observers will be arguing about for years. Republicans didn't just pass the plan, they passed it with large enough majorities to implement it immediately, and for one very specific reason: to undermine a ballot initiative that would have increased the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour, indexed to inflation, including the same higher amount for tipped workers. 

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The second part of the equation, they wrote, is that Gov. Rick Snyder "reportedly secured a promise from Democratic leaders that in exchange for the $9.25 minimum wage the minority party will supply votes for a $1.5 billion increase in the state's fuel taxes to repair roads and bridges."

So taxpayers get hit twice. And it’s happening without any attempt from the GOP-controlled Legislature to rein in spending on programs that have proven to shift tax dollars at best, and waste them at worst. Lehman and LaFaive continued: 

For instance the state still lavishes $50 million in direct cash subsidies on movie makers and another $250 million in support of the state's corporate welfare programs. Privatizing some prison facilities could save tens of millions, according to our research at the Mackinac Center. But the difficulty of cutting special-interest spending is so great that even a large tax increase seems preferable to the GOP.

GOP legislators could take a cue from their Democratic counterparts and go on the offensive, Lehman and LaFaive wrote. 

In doing so, taxpayers might be put at the top of the list of considerations rather than the special interests.

The Mackinac Center is hosting a discussion about how to mitigate the damage caused by the increase in the minimum wage at noon today in Lansing. James Sherk, senior policy analyst in labor economics with the Heritage Foundation, is the keynote speaker. To watch the event online, click here.

Related Articles:

National Conservative Groups Push to End Civil Asset Forfeiture

Party In Crony Capitalism Revolt Holds Convention at Government-Owned Hotel

House Republican Policy Plan Lays the Groundwork for Action

Headaches of Road Funding and Courser-Gamrat Scandal Now Blowing In the Wind

GOP Group Calls for Eliminating Civil Forfeiture

GOP Helping Big Spending Public School Lobby

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Participants in the 2016 Detroit Children's Business Fair show their grasp on how markets work. Featured are responses to the such thoughts as hoarding profit for personal gain, penalizing those who earn more and regulating private business.

Related Sites