Michigan House members are worried about large and substantial "transition costs" when closing the pension fund and offering new members a defined-contribution retirement plan.

They should know better than to be waylaid by these "transition costs." The state is already adept at avoiding them. Indeed, it’s implementing this evasion in the very same fund that they’re working on reforming, the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System.

There are seven state universities that participate in this system. In 1995, the legislature closed them out. All of the university’s current employees would continue on in the pension system, but the university would be free to offer whatever retirement benefit it wanted to new employees.

Unfortunately, the system was only 74.6 percent funded at the time. Legislators felt that these universities had not paid their full share of the benefits earned by their members and retirees, and wanted the universities to contribute for as long as their members were a part of the system. So they applied the costs to catch up on underfunding to the payroll of all employees.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

A report from the House Fiscal Agency explains what happened:

Spreading the costs of paying off the UAAL [unfunded accrued actuarial liability] across all university employee payroll, rather than just MPSERS payroll, addresses the inevitable decline that has taken place in MPSERS payroll as new employees enter university-run retirement systems. The costs were applied on a percentage-of-payroll basis, rather than a fixed-dollar basis, to avoid larger dollar contributions in the years immediately following the legislative change that removed new employees from MPSERS.

The universities would stop paying these amortization expenses on all payroll in 2036, according to the HFA report.

In other words, legislators avoided "transition costs" by applying amortization payments to all employees. Legislators can do the exact same thing for the rest of the system, closing out the system while paying off the unfunded liabilities without "transition costs."

Legislators who use these transition costs as an excuse to avoid defined-contribution reforms should know better.

They’re stumbling on a barrier that they are already avoiding.


See also:

Study Finds That Teacher Pension Plan Unlikely to be Fully-Funded - Education group disputes House GOP projections

Fix the Real Problem of the Pension System

The Legislature Must Fix Teacher Pensions the Right Way

GOP-Led House Passes New ‘Tax’ On Private Contract Workers To Pay For Retirement System Liabilities

Commentary: Shifting School Employees to a 401(k) Is the Most Important Thing

Related Articles:

House Republican Policy Plan Lays the Groundwork for Action

Why Michigan Pension Reform Matters

As Soaring Pension Debt Eats Budgets, Teacher Says Reform ‘Makes No Sense’

Republicans, Pursue Your Agenda with Gusto

Defined-Contribution Plans Help State Credit

Why Pension Reform Is Hard for Politicians

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Detroit Prep is a top-rated and economically and racially diverse charter school in the city. It's growth means it needs to move out from a church basement and into a new location. Nearby is a former Detroit Public Schools building, sitting empty for years. But, worried about competition, the public school district refused to sell. For years, district and local government officials in Detroit had worked to block public charter schools. They pushed legislation at the Michigan Capitol to hinder them, refused to sell to them, transferred surplus buildings from the district to the city government and imposed deed restrictions on property sales to private developers. All of it was aimed to hinder or even prevent charter school choice outside the confines of the Detroit school district.

Related Sites