Talent Mercantilists Running Amok In Michigan

Growing the state's economy is more than just having more degrees

State degrees and job growth

A lead editorial this past week in The Detroit News stated that, "Wide consensus exists that if Michigan is to become a top state for jobs and investment, it must develop a stronger talent pool." They’re not alone.

There’s a push to spend more tax money on state universities based on a theory called Talent Mercantilism. It is an ineffective approach to growing the state economy, one whose main effect is to waste taxpayer money.

Mercantilism was the 17th century idea that the only thing a nation needed to become prosperous was to increase its stock of gold and silver. Talent mercantilists just substitute college degrees for precious metals, assuming that more college graduates are evidence of more talent in the economy.

Mercantilism was wrong because there’s more to an economy than the medium of exchange. Talent mercantilists are wrong because many more factors contribute to modern economies than just having educated people around: property rights, entrepreneurial instincts, access to capital, certainty of exchange, etc.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Having smart people is just one piece of the puzzle, not the key to economic growth.

While it’s true that college graduates have higher incomes than those who are not, this does not automatically translate into higher economic growth for an entire state. That can be shown by comparing states that are successful at growing their college graduates with those that are successful at growing their economies. It turns out that the one has very little to do with the other, as I show here.

If the talent mercantilist theory is wrong then policies based on it are flawed. The talent mercantiists would like the state to increase university appropriations. More tax money in state universities leads to more grads which generates more growth, they argue.

But this is a problematic for a number of reasons.

  • Just giving universities more tax money will doesn't guarantee that more students will graduate.
  • Michigan’s universities are stuck in an apparently perpetual administrative bloat that’s absorbed most increase in university resources. Any additional money for universities is likely to be tied up into ever-expanding administration instead of expanding the capacities to graduate more students.
  • Even if more tax money meant more graduates, it’s not clear that more graduates mean a smarter population. Current universities do a bad job measuring whether their students ever learn anything, and there’s evidence that many do not.
  • It’s unclear whether Michigan would retain graduates from state universities. College graduates are nomadic — they’ll relocate to where they find an opportunity.

Indeed, if state policymakers wanted to ensure the state would get more graduates from university appropriations, it would subsidize the students instead of the institutions. A tuition grant to Michigan students that included incentives to graduate would be a much more effective way of getting more college graduates in the state.

However, policymakers should first question whether more graduates should be a state policy goal, given that this has not meant more growth for a state.

Taxpayers have little to show for the billions that past politicians have spent on state universities. Today's legislators should be skeptical about spending more.

Related Articles:

‘Fact Check’ on Higher Education Piece Falls Flat

New Study Calls for More Spending to Provide Nothing

Getting More College Grads Won’t Improve State Prosperity

Productive Skills, Not College Degrees, Key to Economic Prosperity

Detroit Charters Send More Graduates to College Than Peers Do

Giving More Taxpayer Dollars to Universities Won’t Make Michigan More Educated

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Detroit Prep is a top-rated and economically and racially diverse charter school in the city. It's growth means it needs to move out from a church basement and into a new location. Nearby is a former Detroit Public Schools building, sitting empty for years. But, worried about competition, the public school district refused to sell. For years, district and local government officials in Detroit had worked to block public charter schools. They pushed legislation at the Michigan Capitol to hinder them, refused to sell to them, transferred surplus buildings from the district to the city government and imposed deed restrictions on property sales to private developers. All of it was aimed to hinder or even prevent charter school choice outside the confines of the Detroit school district.

Related Sites