Michigan state employees had ample reason to celebrate the new year — their unions can no longer get them fired for not paying dues or fees.

Almost all of the collective bargaining agreements between the state and its classified employee unions expired Dec. 31, meaning that right-to-work now applies to the vast majority of the more than 35,000 unionized state employees and they can exercise their rights immediately.

"Yes, state employees will have the option of opting out of the union," said Kurt Weiss, spokesman for the State Budget Office.

Unlike the Michigan Education Association, which attempts to limit teachers from exercising their rights to a narrow window every year, almost all contracts for civil service employees provide that these state workers can revoke payment or membership at any time.

Last year, several unions including those affiliated with the UAW, SEIU, and AFCME sued the state claiming the new right-to-work law could not be applied to public sector employees in the state's civil service system. The unions argued that Article 11, Section 5, of the state constitution carved out these employees and gave the Michigan Civil Service Commission the authority to regulate the conditions of their employment.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Following that rationale meant the Legislature could not write a law giving state civil service employees the choice to financially support the government union at their worksite or not.

The Michigan Court of Appeals disagreed, ruling that the state's right-to-work "is constitutional as applied to classified civil service positions in Michigan" and therefore applies to state civil service employees.

Specifically, in August 2013 the court held that the Legislature has the power to "to enact laws relative to conditions of employment, and [apply] those laws toward all employment in the state, public and private, civil service or not civil service" and that "Michigan caselaw fully supports the principle that the Legislature, as the policymaking branch of government, has the power to pass labor laws of general applicability that also apply to classified civil service employees."

The case is on appeal to the state Supreme Court but in the meantime, the tens of thousands of unionized state workers can determine if their union is worth the cost.

While there are an assortment of economic benefits associated with right-to-work states, the most important thing is the freedom to choose whether or not to pay money to private groups in order to hold a job. Thankfully, the government in Michigan will no longer be forcing money to be extracted from citizens merely because of where they work.

Workers can find more information on how to exercise their rights on the Mackinac Center's website, www.MIWorkerFreedom.org. On the website workers can determine if right-to-work applies to them and can download a form to opt-out of their union. 

F. Vincent Vernuccio is the director of labor policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Jarrett Skorup is a research associate for the Center.

Related Articles:

Free The Unions — Let Workers Who Don't Pay Represent Themselves

Union Attempt to Force Teacher to Pay Fees Deemed Illegal Under Right-to-Work

Another Judge Upholds Teachers’ Right-to-Work Status; Faults Union’s Tactics

Unions Admit Forcing People to Pay Dues is Political

A Look at Unions in Michigan, Five Years After Right-to-Work

Teachers in Taylor Win Final Right-to-Work Battle

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Detroit Prep is a top-rated and economically and racially diverse charter school in the city. It's growth means it needs to move out from a church basement and into a new location. Nearby is a former Detroit Public Schools building, sitting empty for years. But, worried about competition, the public school district refused to sell. For years, district and local government officials in Detroit had worked to block public charter schools. They pushed legislation at the Michigan Capitol to hinder them, refused to sell to them, transferred surplus buildings from the district to the city government and imposed deed restrictions on property sales to private developers. All of it was aimed to hinder or even prevent charter school choice outside the confines of the Detroit school district.

Related Sites