MEA President Inflating Public Pension with $200K Salary While Working for Private Union

Lansing School District keeps Steve Cook in public employee pension system

MEA President Steve Cook. Image via

Steve Cook, the president of the state's largest teachers union, is also listed as the highest-paid employee of the Lansing School District. His annual salary is $20,000 more than that of the district’s superintendent.

The deal between the Lansing School District and the Michigan Education Association allows Cook to remain a member of the state’s pension system for school employees while working full-time as president of the private union. This lets him accrue pension benefits based on his $201,613 MEA salary, setting Cook up for a much higher post-retirement payout from the underfunded public school employees pension system.

The Lansing School District approved the deal, under which Cook is classified as an “educator on loan” from the district to the union. The district has said it was reimbursed by the union for all of the expenses of the arrangement.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

According to the district, Cook works for the MEA and has no job responsibilities with Lansing schools.

The practice raises questions as to why someone serving as a high level executive in a private organization would be allowed to remain in an underfunded government pension system, leveraging his six-figure salary to garner a much higher pension payout.

A public school employee’s pension formula is based upon years on the payroll and the final three or five years of compensation, depending upon the plan. If the district is allowing Cook to substitute his $201,613 MEA salary for pension calculations – which the pension fund contributions it makes on his behalf suggest – this would greatly increase Cook’s annual pension payout. Cook spent 15 years in the Lansing School District as a paraprofessional.

In 2014, the Lansing School District contributed $51,976 on Cook’s behalf to the public school employee retirement plan, called Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS). In 2013, the average salary for a Lansing School District teacher was $64,814. The annual contribution to MPSERS by the district for a teacher of that salary would be $16,709.

The arrangement by which the district makes pension contributions based on Cook's six-figure MEA salary has been in place for at least four years.

The Lansing School District answered some basic questions about Cook’s arrangement with the district but refused to answer more detailed follow-up questions.

Robert Kolt, a spokesman for the district, said it had “already responded to your questions.” He added, “There is no reason for you to continue to ask the same questions again and again; you have answers. There is no need for you to email again.”

Yvonne Caamal Canul, district superintendent, was asked to explain the responsibilities that Cook has as an “educator on loan.”

“Mr. Cook’s responsibilities are determined by the organization to which he is being loaned,” Canul said in an email.

But the responses and refusals leave many questions unanswered. Cook was employed by the district as a “paraprofessional” (classroom assistant) for 15 years. He served as the president of the Lansing assistants union from 1981 to 1993. Cook became the secretary-treasurer of the MEA in 1991.

It is unclear how long Cook has been an “educator on loan” with the school district. It’s also unclear how the school district handled Cook’s involvement with the MEA.

The Michigan Education Association has not responded to emails or a phone message asking for comment on Cook’s arrangement.

Also unclear is whether any other public school district has ever “loaned” an employee to a private entity, as happened in this instance.

Bill DiSessa, spokesman for the Michigan Department of Education, said they use an “educator on loan” occasionally.

“Typically, we borrow an educator with the expertise we want for a special project. That educator remains employed at his or her district and retains their longevity and seniority. We reimburse the district for their costs. When the project is done, the educator returns to their district,” DiSessa said in an email.

“We use this process occasionally. Local districts and ISD also make use of this process, though we keep no data on it. It can be a win-win. For instance, if District A loses a teacher to maternity leave and District B has an under-used teacher, that teacher can help out temporarily in District A until its teacher returns from leave. This is just one example,” DiSessa said.


See also:

MEA Executives Take Big Pay Raises While Liabilities Continue to Grow

MEA Spends More On Salaries, Benefits Than Member Representation

MEA Executive Salaries 'Not Based On Merit'

The Union 'Free-Rider Problem' Myth In Right-to-Work Debate

Teacher Union Executives Get Big Raises as Teachers Take Cuts

School Union Asks For Members Bank Account, Credit Card Numbers to Guarantee Dues Payments

Related Articles:

Outgoing Leader Was Disastrous for Teachers Union

The Fake School Employee: Retiring Union President Spikes $115K State Pension

Another Pension ‘Spike’ For Outgoing Teachers Union President

Another Judge Upholds Teachers’ Right-to-Work Status; Faults Union’s Tactics

Teachers Union Head Gets Annual $92,000 Pension Bonus, Courtesy of Taxpayers

Teacher Sues Union Over Right-to-Work

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Detroit Prep is a top-rated and economically and racially diverse charter school in the city. It's growth means it needs to move out from a church basement and into a new location. Nearby is a former Detroit Public Schools building, sitting empty for years. But, worried about competition, the public school district refused to sell. For years, district and local government officials in Detroit had worked to block public charter schools. They pushed legislation at the Michigan Capitol to hinder them, refused to sell to them, transferred surplus buildings from the district to the city government and imposed deed restrictions on property sales to private developers. All of it was aimed to hinder or even prevent charter school choice outside the confines of the Detroit school district.

Related Sites