New Study Calls for More Spending to Provide Nothing

Higher education costs are increasing, but why?

A study from the Michigan League for Public Policy says that Michigan should spend more taxpayer dollars on state universities. This would do little to lower tuition, though, until the schools stop their spending spree.

For universities, tuition and taxpayer support are revenues that pay for their expenses. The League states that cuts in taxpayer funding of universities are the culprit for tuition increases. The biggest driver for tuition increases, however, is not stagnant taxpayer support but university expenses.

Say that legislators wanted to use taxpayer money to keep tuition at what it was a decade ago. In that case, the state would need to spend another $1.5 billion, doubling what taxpayers currently spend.

Prospective students have largely ignored university sticker prices when making their selections. Easy credit (often subsidized) means that unaffordability does not limit their decisions. So universities tend to compete on things other than price. College support staff, in particular, is an ever-increasing expense.

The League makes no attempt to analyze the reasons for the increased expenses that are driving tuition up.

One day, students will be more cost conscious about the bill for higher education. That, rather than doubling taxpayer support, will provide a stronger incentive for universities to keep tuition low.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Related Articles:

The Evidence is Clear: State Spending on Colleges is Wasteful

Higher Education Spending Still Down After Michigan's 'Lost Decade,' But Rising

‘Fact Check’ on Higher Education Piece Falls Flat

Higher Education Subsidies: Is College More ‘Affordable’ for Those Who Don’t Go?

Productive Skills, Not College Degrees, Key to Economic Prosperity

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


Renting out the family summer cottage is a common practice in Michigan, and with today’s technologies, it’s easier than ever, empowered by services like AirBnB, HomeAway, VRBO and more. These short-term rentals mean vacationers can find a place much more easily and inexpensively, while owners can earn some extra money. It seems like a win-win. Not everyone agrees. Some in the accommodations and tourism industries aren’t happy with the increased competition and are advocating for limiting people’s rights to rent out their homes. Some homeowner associations are pushing back as well. And while cities like Detroit and Grand Rapids have mostly embraced home sharing, some local governments have restricted and even banned the practice.

Related Sites