Law Judge To Hear Unfair Labor Practice Complaints Against MEA

Union limits information and dates available to teachers who want to leave

The Michigan Education Association says its members can only leave the union during a limited window in August, and on Wednesday it is scheduled to sit in front of an administrative law judge to explain why.

A group of Saginaw Public Schools teachers challenged the MEA's policies and filed unfair labor practice complaints with the Michigan Employment Relations Commission to get out of the union.

At the hearing before Administrative Law Judge Julia C. Stern the MEA is expected to defend its practices surrounding how it deals with members who want to leave the union as part of the state's right-to-work law. MEA officials have insisted that information about leaving was available to all members.

However, the union only informs members of the August window if they specifically ask about it.

MEA Executive Director Gretchen Dziadosz is expected to be questioned at the hearing.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation is representing the Saginaw teachers. 

"We're looking forward to participating in the hearing and questioning the MEA about this issue," said Patrick Wright, director of the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation.

Michigan's right-to-work law allows workers to leave their union when their contract expires. The law also says workers can no longer be fired for not paying dues or fees as a condition of employment. Fees often amount to up to 90 percent of dues costs.

MERC operates within Michigan's Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and its purpose is to resolve labor disputes involving public and private sector employees by appointing mediators, arbitrators and fact finders. It also conducts union representation elections, determines appropriate bargaining units and makes decisions on unfair labor practice cases.


See also:

MEA Says Union Members Should Have Known About Limited Window To Leave

Teachers To Lawmakers: MEA Wouldn't Tell Us How To Leave Union

Disrespect, Bullying Convinces Paraeducator That Union Not Interested In Its Members

Bipartisan Senate Panel To Investigate Possible MEA Right-to-Work Violations

Teachers Sue MEA To Escape Union

Union Threatens Hall of Fame Coach With Legal Action For Not Paying Dues

Teacher Who Never Wanted Union Representation Still Forced To Be a Member

Teacher Got Plenty of Info About Paying Dues, Nothing About Opting Out of the MEA

Know Your Rights: MI Worker Freedom

Related Articles:

Wright Joins Beckmann to Discuss August Window Win

Court of Appeals Denies MEA’s Request to Keep ‘August Window’

Court of Appeals Unanimously Rules Against MEA’s ‘August Window’; Upholds Teachers’ Right to Work

MEA Announces Violation of Right-to-Work Law, Says Members May Leave at Anytime

New ‘Labor Voices’ Column, Same Old Teachers Union Disinformation

Fighting For a Teacher’s Right to Work

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites