Michigan Crushes Korea in Corporate Welfare Handouts

Nearly $9 billion in crony-capitalism subsidies

The flag of South Korea. Image via Wikipedia.

The Wall Street Journal recently criticized government subsidies that South Korean politicians have granted to the country’s large industrial conglomerates, called “chaebols.” The newspaper’s editorial board wrote:

But the country’s chaebol conglomerates continue to receive massive state support across a range of industries. After a legislator extracted detailed figures from the government, the Hankyoreh newspaper calculated that in 2012 Seoul gave $673.9 million in direct subsidies to the chaebol. That doesn’t count low-interest loans, tax breaks and protection from competition, the main tools of Korea’s industrial policy.

Just $673.9 million? Pikers. Michigan has a population that is just one-fifth of South Korea’s in size. But in in the 2000s, and especially in 2009 and 2010, its politicians and subsidy-granting officials managed to approve nearly $9 billion in subsidies to corporate interests, including the Big 3 automakers.

Granted, the money redistributed from Michigan taxpayers will be given to companies over many years, not just one. But the sums are still large. This year, the state will write $1.031 billion in checks to corporations for “refundable” credits that exceed the amount of taxes they owe.

And this was just one of scores of corporate welfare giveaways approved by this state’s Legislature in the last decade. Thankfully, the pace has slowed (though not stopped) under the current administration, but the decisions of past years are still straining state budgets. They also raise obstacles to returning some of the state’s growing revenues to citizens in the form of a tax cut.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The Wall Street Journal concluded, “South Koreans have begun to question the political pull of the chaebol that allows them to carve out profitable niches at the expense of the consumer and taxpayer.”

Michigan citizens should be asking the same question.


Related Articles:

The Lawmakers that Voted for the Most Business Subsidies and the Least

Tilt from Tax Cutting to Corporate Welfare Renews Failed Approach to Economic Growth

Return of the Mega Subsidy

22 Of 498 Michigan Legislators Said 'No' To Corporate Welfare Since 2001

Lonely Are The Michigan Democrats Who Oppose State Checks To Corporations

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:

Facebook
Twitter

Detroit Prep is a top-rated and economically and racially diverse charter school in the city. It's growth means it needs to move out from a church basement and into a new location. Nearby is a former Detroit Public Schools building, sitting empty for years. But, worried about competition, the public school district refused to sell. For years, district and local government officials in Detroit had worked to block public charter schools. They pushed legislation at the Michigan Capitol to hinder them, refused to sell to them, transferred surplus buildings from the district to the city government and imposed deed restrictions on property sales to private developers. All of it was aimed to hinder or even prevent charter school choice outside the confines of the Detroit school district.

Related Sites