The city of Grand Rapids is a model of government transparency, while the local transit partnership leaves something to be desired, according to a Kent County organization.

Kent County Families for Fiscal Responsibility, a nonpartisan taxpayer advocacy group, gives the city of Grand Rapids an “A” for “doing an excellent job of posting information for the public’s awareness.” However, the local Interurban Transit Partnership, The Rapid, received a “D–.”

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

“We were surprised by how little information The Rapid makes available to the taxpayers of Kent County,” the group stated in the press release. “[W]e hope that, because of this poor showing, the board of directors of The Rapid dedicates some resources to improving this score in the future.”

On its website, the organization’s transparency project says that it is not surprised by the findings, explaining that it has had to “resort to Freedom of Information Act requests” just to get “basic information” from the transit group.

“It’s unfortunate that The Rapid, which sees fit to spend $250,000 on a piece of art for its headquarters, can’t spend some money to make itself more transparent to the taxpayers who pay the bills. It’s extremely inexpensive to post information to the Internet these days, but our inclination is that The Rapid does this on purpose.”

The Rapid CEO Peter Varga disagrees with the group’s assessment. In an email, Varga said, “The Rapid is a highly transparent public enterprise, accountable to taxpayers and continuously reports measurable success.

“The Board of Directors holds open meetings including all committee meetings, the budgets are approved in a public setting, the minutes are posted on line, and major documents such as Environmental Assessments, alternatives analysis and the Transit Master Plan are available to the public and on line.”

KCFFR says on its website that each governmental body was rated based on availability of information, budgets and audits, meeting minutes, employee pay scales, union contracts and other select information. Scores were added up based on the number of possible points, and a final letter grade was assigned

The group believes the ease of posting this information online for local taxpayers to see should spur transparency in the county.

“The whole purpose of the survey is to gauge our local governments in their level of transparency, provide a means of determining progress from one year to the next, and hopefully encourage some productive competition to improve easy access to information,” said spokesman Eric Larson.

The full list of scores and criteria applied by KCFFR is available here. A report card from The Rapid is available here.


See also:

A Transparency Fight in the Village of Armada

Sun May Finally Shine on State Pols' Staff Salary Secrets

A Little School — A Big Idea

Show Michigan the Money — Government Transparency Progject

Stay Engaged

Simply enter your email below to receive our weekly email:


There aren’t many policies that get near unanimous support from economists, but free trade is one of them. Despite this, a central theme of the 2016 presidential campaign, heard from both political parties, was that free trade was somehow harmful to the United States and corrective action was needed. Mark Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, makes the case for why President Trump’s assessment of free trade is misguided.

Related Sites